Showing posts with label News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label News. Show all posts

Sunday, July 28, 2013

10 Things You Probably Didn’t Know About ‘The Simpsons’

The Simpsons fox bart homer lisa maggie marge matt groening
Fox
After 23 seasons of laughs, it’s hard to imagine a world where ‘The Simpsons’ aren’t on television. In addition to being the longest-running scripted series in TV history, ‘Simpsons’ quotes and references have become part of our daily vernacular. And yet, the show’s storied history and the behind-the-scenes tales of how the characters came to life have been barely noticed in the large shadow its iconic characters have cast on the world.
‘The Simpsons’ hasn’t just created a media and merchandising empire that has brought the world 500 TV episodes, a movie, countless toys and even a theme park ride. It has also launched the careers of some of the biggest names in comedy (Conan O’Brien, we’ll always bow to you for the monorail episode) and turned its creator Matt Groening into a mainstream counterculture hero. So as the show reaches into its landmark 500th episode, it’s worth noting some of the more interesting facts and figures behind Springfield’s most famous residents.

matt groening bart simpson life in hell
Kevin Winter, Getty
1. Matt Groening got his big break when his comic strip was given as a gift
 
Long before Groening became a giant in television, he made his living with the alternative newspaper comic strip 'Life in Hell,' a funny, bleak look at the world through the eyes of a depressed rabbit named Bongo. Groening's artwork caught the eye of Polly Platt, a production designer who worked on the Oscar-winning film 'Terms of Endearment' with 'Simpsons' co-creator James L. Brooks. According to the book 'The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History' by John Ortved, she wanted to thank Brooks for getting her an Oscar nomination and bought the original copy of one of Groening's 'Life in Hell' comic strips titled "The Los Angeles Way of Death" as a thank you gift. Ken Estin, a producer who worked with Brooks on 'Taxi,' also received a "Life in Hell" comic strip as a birthday gift during a retreat to brainstorm ideas for what would become the Fox sketch comedy series 'The Tracey Ullman Show.' The strips became the topic of conversation during the retreat and the decision was ultimately made to bring Groening on board to do short cartoons for the short-lived sketch series.
 
the simpsons matt groening tracy ullman

2. The Simpsons are based on Matt Groening's family

  
Groening was initially asked to make 'Life in Hell' cartoons for 'The Tracey Ullman Show,' but decided at the last minute that he didn't want to lose the merchandising rights to his offbeat comic strip. Instead, Groening dreamed up an idea on the fly moments before meeting James L. Brooks that involved a family very much like his own. (His dad's name is actually Homer, his mother Margaret and his younger sisters are named Lisa and Maggie.) So where did Bart come from? It's an anagram for "brat." (Groening has said the character is loosely based on himself and his brother Mark.) Fun fact: Groening's mom's maiden name is Wiggum.
 
simpsons tracey ullman

3. Fox wanted to kill the early 'Simpsons' cartoons

  
While the ratings for 'The Tracey Ullman Show' weren't exactly gangbusters, 'The Simpsons' shorts were a huge hit with viewers. But that didn't stop Fox from wanting to scrap them. The cartoons cost around $15,000 each to produce and test audiences gave them low ratings. Thankfully, Brooks saw some deep potential in the cartoon family and when the network canceled 'Ullman,' he pushed for 'The Simpsons' to become a series of its own. So in essence, 'The Simpsons' is the most successful spin-off of all time.
 
barbara bush first lady marge simpson
Scott Olson, Getty Images

4. Former First Lady Barbara Bush once got a personal letter from Marge Simpson

In 1989, Brooks, Groening and writer/producer Sam Simon managed to convince Fox to turn 'The Simpsons' into a series, starting with the Christmas special 'Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire.' The single episode netted Fox's biggest audience for a show at that time and turned the bizarre-looking family into a cultural touchstone. The show also attracted its fair share of controversy and criticism from parents who thought The Simpsons were a bad influence on children. Former First Lady Barbara Bush remarked to People Magazine in 1990 that she had seen the show and thought it "was the dumbest thing I had ever seen." Soon after the interview hit the stands, the White House received a personalized letter from Marge Simpson addressed to the First Lady. Marge admitted her family wasn't perfect but she told Mrs. Bush that she still tried to instill humility in her children and "believed in my heart that we have a great deal in common. Each of us [is] living our lives to serve an exceptional man." The letter so moved Mrs. Bush that she wrote a response apologizing for her remarks and complementing Marge for "setting a good example for the rest of the country."
 
tomtom homer simpson gps sat nav
Stephen Shugerman, Getty

5. Homer has the most downloaded GPS voice in the world

 
Homer Simpson has a distinctive voice, a mix of Walter Matthau and voice actor Dan Castellaneta's own father. TomTom hired Castellaneta in 2009 to record directions for a Homer voice that customers could download for their GPS devices along with other TV icons like SpongeBob SquarePants, Bert and Ernie from 'Sesame Street' and KITT from 'Knight Rider.' The Homer voice has become the most downloaded SAT NAV voice in the world, according to the Guinness Book of World Records. It has been downloaded for TomToms 128,500 times in the U.S. alone, which accounts for more than 40% of GPS devices in the world. The sales of the Homer voice was so successful that TomTom recently hired co-stars Julie Kavner to record a Marge Simpson GPS voice and Harry Shearer to record a Mr. Burns voice.
 
homer lisa the greek the simpsons football super bowl
Fox / OVGuide.com

6. Lisa correctly predicted three Super Bowl wins in one episode

 
The season three episode 'Lisa the Greek,' one of the sweeter moments between the oafish Homer and the brainy Lisa, featured the pair spending quality time by betting on NFL football games thanks to Lisa's never-fail system for picking a winner. The episode was timed to air just before Super Bowl XXVI between the Washington Redskins and the Buffalo Bills. Lisa realizes that Homer only wanted to hang out with her so he could bet on the winner. So the hurt Lisa predicts that Washington will win, but if she subconsciously doesn't love him and wants him to lose, Buffalo will win. According to the DVD commentary, the cast rerecorded the lines to coincide with the next two Super Bowls with the episode airing before each game. Showrunner Al Jean said Lisa not only correctly predicted the outcome of three big games, but he also bet against Lisa's picks in the Gracie Films' notoriously competitive office pool and lost.
 
simpsons house henderson nevada
Travelshackblog.com / Google Mpas

7. A real life version of The Simpsons' home was built in Nevada

 
Fox and Pepsi got together to offer the ultimate collectible for 'Simpsons' fans: a real world replica of the family's colorful home in a subdivision in Henderson, Nevada, just outside Las Vegas. The winner, however, opted to take the cash prize instead of the home and the eerily accurate house became a tourist stop for 'Simpsons' fans. The four bedroom, two-bath home stayed in its traditional TV colors until 2001 when the subdivision started to fill with other residents. The developers had it repainted to fit the neighborhood's scheme and stripped it of all of its 'Simpsons'-esque props and furnishings. Today, it looks just like any other home on the block but it does retain one 'Simpsons' reference: it's located in the Springfield subdivision.
 
simpsons toys
Scott Gries, Getty

8. 'Simpsons' toys are illegal in Iran

 
The Simpsons have always faced some form of controversy since their skyrocketing popularity turned them into a ratings and merchandising juggernaut. Iran, however, has taken a rather extreme method of addressing their concerns over the show's sarcastic, counterculture attitudes. The nation's Intellectual Development of Children and Young Adults recently issued an edict that forbade the sale of any Simpsons toys in any Iranian store. The nation banned the toys for their ability to promote Western culture and the "destructive cultural and social consequences" they supposedly promote. Iran has also placed Barbie dolls on the same list, opting instead for a line of dolls that promote more traditional Iranian, state-approved styles of dressing. Al Jean responded to the ban by telling the Los Angeles Times, "This means war."
 
moe szyslak rich hall
Fox / Hulu / Chris Jackson, Getty

9. Several of the show's characters are based on real people

  
Some of the show's more iconic characters might seem like figments of some very talented imaginations, but they actually come from some real people. The gruff, gravelly-voiced Moe Szyslak is based on the similarly gruff, gravelly-voiced comedian Rich Hall who used to work with 'Simpsons' writer George Meyer on the '80s comedy series 'Not Necessarily the News.' Waylon Smithers, Mr. Burns' overly devoted assistant, is actually based on 'Simpsons' associate producer Richard Sakai, though reportedly somewhat out of spite. According to 'The Simpsons Uncensored,' Sakai started on the show as an assistant for Brooks. Estin claims in the book that everyone liked Sakai, but noted he was seen as a guy who was fiercely loyal to Brooks so the writers modeled his behavior around the office for Smithers' devotion to Burns.
 
homer defined homer simpson
Fox

10. "D'oh!" is a real word in the Oxford English Dictionary...but not in 'Simpsons' scripts

 
'The Simpsons' have infiltrated just about every aspect of modern culture, but perhaps it's most impressive in its ability to worm its way into our language. The Oxford English Dictionary announced in 2001 that Homer's most frequent utterance, "D'oh!," would earn a spot in its dictionary along with several other pop-culture phrases and words. The OED defines it as "Expressing frustration at the realization that things have turned out badly or not as planned, or that one has just said or done something foolish." However, when it first appeared in a 'Simpsons' script, the phrase was written as "annoyed grunt." Dan Castellaneta came up with the signature catchphrase, which he claims to have borrowed from 'Laurel and Hardy' star Jimmy Finlayson who would utter "D'oooooh" in a state of frustration. Groening had him shorten it since the early shorts were only a minute long and "D'oh!" was easier to animate.
 
 

5 Things That Bothered Me About ‘Iron Man 3

Final Iron Man 3 header
I saw Iron Man 3 this past week, and I enjoyed the film well enough. Shane Black injects some pretty hilarious moments into the franchise and the action beats were more impressive than those in the second film.
But this film is as dumb as a bag of door knobs. It does not rise above the level of popcorn entertainment, and I don’t get film critics who can overlook its myriad of issues. So in the grand tradition of needlessly nitpicking things to death, after the jump you’ll find some of my issues with the film. Feel free to let me know in the comments whether you agree with any of them, as I’m sure you already will. Thanks to Matt Singer for his inspiration (and some of his copy!) in writing this piece.
Massive spoilers for Iron Man 3 follow.
iron man 3
Why does Tony Stark spend 70% of the movie trying to repair/power up his suit, when he has a remote controlled suit army at his disposal? – It’s a pretty stunning moment when Tony Stark barely makes it out of Malibu after his entire house destroyed by the putative terrorists. Tony Stark’s array of suits has been exploded, it seems. The haunting, silent opening shots from the film hammer home that idea. So Stark’s quest to repair and power up his final suit carries a lot of dramatic tension. This is his last suit! He’ll need it to defeat the villains in the film.
All of that tension is totally undercut when at the end of the film, Stark is able to call upon dozens upon dozens of Iron Men suits, all of them with high-powered AI that autonomously lay waste to the enemy. It’s like knowing Neo can fly away from any fight in The Matrix Reloaded. Once you have that knowledge, doesn’t every struggle seem kind of unnecessary? Or in this case, doesn’t the sagging middle section of the film, in which a suit-less Stark barely evades death on a number of occasions, seem kind of unnecessary?
Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 2.01.10 PM
Product placement up the wazoo – Guys, it’s important to know that when Tony Stark hacks into military databases, only hardware prominently displayed from Sun and Oracle will suffice. And that the reporter recording Tony Stark at the press conference was using a TCL cell phone, because their phones offer superior picture and sound. And Tony Stark drives an Audi, a company that I’m pretty sure had category exclusivity in the film (notice the lack of a Mustang logo on the car at the end)? He also bought FiOS for that kid, because lousy Comcast broadband just would not do. Lower quality products just won’t do.
Look, I’m no rube. I understand the realities of modern day filmmaking. But every now and then the “product integration” breaches the fourth wall and rips you out of the film. This film did it multiple times.

Screen Shot 2013-05-04 at 2.12.43 PM
Let’s let a killing machine on board with the President of the United States - One of the best action beats in the film takes place when Iron Patriot is commandeered by James Badge Dale and decides to go all aggro aboard Air Force One. Brilliant idea. Here’s the deadliest weapon known to mankind — but let’s not take five seconds to check if he’s actual manned by the guy who’s supposed to be in there. I guess when you see a dude in the Iron Patriot suit, you assume it’s YOUR dude in the Iron Patriot suit.
mandarin
WTF is Killian’s plan anyway? – The way the Mandarin reveal is handled is both masterful and hilarious. There was a moment of geek joy when I realized that everything the movie marketing led me to believe about the primary villain of this film was wrong. It’s mildly exhilarating when a summer tentpole release can still surprise you. (You can read Matt Singer’s excellent piece about this reveal for some more detail about The Mandarin’s role in the comics).
But aside from some quest for power, what the hell was Killian trying to accomplish? He tortured Tony Stark because Stark spurned him back in 1999, sure. He used The Mandarin as a spokesperson because it just made good business sense. He was going to install the VP as his figurehead and he was going force Tony to perfect the Extremis formula, and…what? Why did the guy turn totally nutso and evil? All of the other villains in the Iron Man franchise have had their motivations better conveyed than this guy, and that is not a very high bar to surmount.
chest
That disaster of an ending – I guess we’ve seen Tony Stark discover new elements and invent crazy stuff in the past. But the ending of this film, in which the curing of Pepper Potts is resolved within seconds, felt like a bridge too far. And oh, the arc reactor in his chest? Not necessary. Dude cooked up a quick, glossed over solution to that one too. So I guess everything ended up okay! Forget the fact that Stark has been dealing with the intractable problem of the heart shrapnel for seven hours of screen time. It was a metaphor for his own personal healing process and growth, and obviously could’ve been solved at any time. WHAT?!
My fellow film writers have put forth a few theories about the rushed ending. Perhaps it’s a way to stage a triumphant return as the Avengers square off against Thanos, one of them suggested. But the theory that Russ Fischer put forth (and which feels right to me) is that it’s to set up a future Avengers/Iron Man films in which Tony Stark is no longer Iron Man. Robert Downey Jr.’s career has most likely reached his apex, but he probably doesn’t want to don that suit for the rest of his life, and Marvel isn’t going to let a cash cow like Tony Stark rest in the fate of a single actor.
As with some of my complaints above, the business logic of doing this makes sense. But in the context of the film, it just doesn’t satisfy.

The Source

RUMOR: Is a THOR Easter Egg in CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER, or Vice Versa?



Thor: The Dark World has gone back to doing some reshoots, while Captain America: The Winter Soldier is pretty much wrapped and moving into post-production.

Before Comic-Con, one of The Daily SuperHero's on-set spies for the Captain America sequel sent a message saying that something strange was happening on set. It was mentioned that several crew members were talking about how they had to film something quick with Thor's hammer, Mjolnir.

No further details were provided besides the fact the hammer is involved which leads The Daily SuperHero to believe one of two things. Either there is some kind of Thor cameo in Captain America 2 or there is some kind of Captain America cameo in Thor: The Dark World, with a focus on Mjolnir.

Either way, stay tuned as it sounds like a potential Easter Egg was filmed for one of the two movies last week.

The Source

Saturday, July 27, 2013

The 6 Most Annoying League of Legends Players

League of Legends is a free online action real time strategy game that is currently my largest addiction. In the game, you have the option of forming a team before entering the fray with five of your closest friends. If, like me, you have no friends, then your other option is the solo-queue, a Russian Roulette of sorts in which you are randomly paired with four complete strangers. My time in both group and solo queue has revealed that there are several archetypes of annoying LoL players that cannot be denied.


The Over-Pingers


Shit is going down. Either your cohorts are walking into some devious trap set by the opposing team or you just scored an ace and it’s time to push. For times like these, Riot encoded into their fine game a feature that allows you to “ping” a certain area of the map to warn others to either advance or retreat. Of course, what happens when you try to give something nice to anonymous man-children on the Internet? They abuse the fuck out of it.

I don’t know if he wants me to go to Baron or if he’s having a seizure
Listen, buddy, one and done. That’s your new rule. You clicking two dozen times on the same spot in case I missed the first ten Navi-level chimes does not benefit anyone in any way. Hell, half of the time when you’re trying to tell me to retreat I flip a mental coin to see if I should even bother listening to you.
Your excessive clicking is not benefiting the team. If anything, you’re just making your partners hate you. Take your finger away from the hot key and breathe. It’s all going to be okay.

The General Custers


Your team is getting crushed. Hard. Excuses aside, everyone including yourself is getting spanked in every fight you come across. The opposing team has out-farmed you, they’re well fed, and they just took out all three of your inhibitors in a glorious strike while you watched through a monochrome haze waiting to rez. The game is over. To save yourself and others the precious moments of life that you would rather fetter away on a fresh game, you throw up the /surrender. You assume you’ll see the green “yes”s fill up the five slotted bar almost instantaneously, but you don’t.
Two votes in, someone has the audacity to opt for “no”. And then, somehow, his blind tenacity causes that one other precious voter to take up his cause. Two votes against and you’re stuck in the game for an another miserable ten minutes. Some people just don’t know when to quit.
These Custers normally fall into two subcategories. The first is the savior. He’s the only one on your team who has done even remotely decently. Any fight that he is not involved in results in another triple-kill, the villains walking away nearly unscathed. In his delusional mind he just needs to initiate properly. He could take the entire team out if only these n00bs would know how to properly tank and let him work his magic.
The second, more common iteration is the idiot. This guy just doesn’t know when to quit because he is somehow oblivious to how much time he is wasting. With his score in the general range of 2/19/4, he is honestly having a good time and just doesn’t want the fun to end no matter how convenient it is to others.
I’ll admit up front that I have been this guy numerous times. I’m sure in every Leaguer’s history there have been one or two games where you just refuse to give up. No matter how many times your partners /surrender you are first to voice your strong opinion of /nosurrender.
“We still have a chance” you spout into the chat log. “We just need to farm up the 5,000g difference between us and our rivals, ace the team that has been crushing us 5v4 for the last 30 minutes, take a quick jaunt over to Baron and then– with our newly acquired buffs– rush to take out all nine of their towers in what will be known as the most glorious comeback in the history of LoL!”
I am all for fighting til the last hit, but it’s best for everyone if you learn the early signs of defeat. If you’re down to your inhibs and they still have every single turret? The game is probably over. Best to just surrender and try harder the next game. You aren’t making any friends in this lost cause.

Internet Tough Guys


We’ve touched on similar subjects in previous articles, but I find that League of Legends boasts its own special brand of anonymous jackass. Not people pretending to be Russian mobsters or delusional, self-proclaimed MMA fighters that “you haven’t heard of yet, but just wait bro,” who used to train everyday with Chuck Lidell, but perhaps just as bad.
It always starts the same, someone on the other team has obtained an obvious advantage in their lane. They’ve gotten a few kills early on and their gold boost has given them a bit of an item advantage. Sure enough, they take out that one still-squishy champ who had no place being where he/she was and in their moment of victory they /all chat something akin to “THAT’S RIGHT! RUN, NOOBS! FEAR ME!”
Really, guy? Of all places to be a total bad ass your choice is to spout intimidations via League of Legends? Do you not have anything else going on in your life?
The bottom line here is that no is impressed. We’re not impressed by your “amazing” 4/0/2 kill streak and when you start typing out slightly adorable insults most people just end up feeling bad for you.

Maybe if I get a penta-kill dad will forgive me for not signing up for football.
I’m not denying that to be really good at LoL takes time and skill. Furthermore, I loves me some proper trash talking. However, is this game really the thing to be boasting about? Consistently? I fear that too many of these kids are gloating without the self-aware sarcasm that most rational adults maintain. The thought makes me a bit sad.

The Insta-boss


You just joined the queue and that guy is already at it. “Don’t pick twitch. We need a tank. Someone pick tank. Too much AP. You two switch, I’m going to instalock Karthus.” As the ticker slowly counts down to the match start a single thought crosses my mind.
The game starts and your new boss is at it again. “Mundo, lux bot. Pantheon you go top. I got mid. CALL MIAS EVERYONE.” As far as he is concerned, this guy owns you for the next thirty minutes. You are nothing more than his NPCs. He’ll be telling you what spells to pick at what levels. He’s critiquing your build during his time spent dead. He’s giving you orders on how every team fight should be initiated.
Sometimes it’s easier to just give in. Listen to the guy. Give him the satisfaction of being the leader for a few fleeting moments. Most of the time, though, I choose to blatantly ignore every command he gives. Nobody puts baby in the corner.
LoL is about teamwork. No one person can win a match without the help of their teammates (unless they’re Garen). You may have more experience than others and I’m not averse to you sharing wisdom. That being said, no one likes a dictator. Once you enter that solo queue you are joining a 30 minute democracy. Everyone deserves to be heard no matter what their experience level. No one is going to become a peon of some dude they just met on the Internet.

The Mythological Feeder and Word-of-the-Day Insulters


While I find the latter of this dual-category much more annoying, I feel that I need to address the former in the name of context.
Feeding, to my knowledge, is a LoL specific term that represents a teammate who is intentionally dying at the hands of the enemy to give your opponents an advantage. A true-blue gesture of trollism, this person enjoys the idea of infuriating teammates one thousand times more than he or she enjoys actually winning at the game. Is it funny? Yes. While never partaking in the activity myself, I can understand the humor behind it. The only problem? I don’t think feeders really exist.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a real “feeder” in my time playing League of Legends. Of course, that doesn’t stop every other person playing the game from shouting this idiom every chance they get.
I think that somewhere around nine out of ten people who get accused of “feeding” are just having a bad game. The term has evolved from labeling a trollish saboteur to someone who just dies a lot. Nevertheless, by the end of the game some ignorant preteen sends out his request: “Guys, report Caitlyn for feeding.”
Some people just don’t match up to your standards. This is exponentially true when you’re getting these people picked out of a virtual hat in a free video game. If I ever meet a honest-to-goodness feeder, I will probably try to image capture undeniable proof, as if I had found a unicorn or the Loche Ness monster. In the mean time, all you can do is quietly ignore those who refuse to save terminology for its proper use.
tl;dr Stop reporting me for feeding.

The Projectionist


The projectionist is another dual-spec douche of the LoL community. His base function is to complain about anything and everything that is happening during a match that he is losing. The common trait being that none of what is occurring is his fault. He normal reveals himself in one of two forms.
The first is the team hater. Sure everyone has died seven or eight times and no one has gotten more than two kills, but it can all be traced back to top feeding their champs. If you were to look at things subjectively, of course, you would notice that the accuser most likely died just as much as those poor souls in top in the same time span. That’s just a simple fact he chooses to ignore. Another funny consistency I’ve noticed is that these guys are almost always mid, and they’re also almost always Ashe.

I don’t know what it is about this character, but she is like a sponge for shit heads.
The second, more delusional and therefore funnier iteration of the Projectionist is the never-give-up trash talker. Your team just dunked your foes. They’re down to inhibitors and the score is somewhere around 27-10 in your favor. Suddenly, this beacon of hate shows himself in /all chat. “Whatever, man. You guys aren’t even good.”
Not even good? Did you see the score? Normally at this point Mr. Hater makes a point to revert back to his first form, blaming his teammates for letting you walk all over them. But before long her returns focus to your team. “You’re not even building right.” Seems to be working out pretty well for me. “I could totally take any of you 1v1.” Real shame it’s a 5v5 game, isn’t it? The poor boy is in denial. It’d be funny if it weren’t so sad.
We all know that no matter what, haters gon’ hate. I suppose this entire article is just me hating in my own special way. All I want is for everyone to get along with one another.
I’ve had solo queue games where everyone is random and anonymous yet we all had a really fun time. I’m talking stuck-out-tongue emoticons and kind compliments to the opponent for a well orchestrated kill. This game can be a pleasant experience for everyone. You just have to let it be.
And stop clicking so much with the fucking pings. I SEE THAT THEY’RE IN THE BUSHES. CHRIST. ONE AND DONE.

The Source